PoliticsTwitterborder wallmansplaining

Border Security Expert Tells 'Mansplaining' Rep. Dan Crenshaw Why A Wall Won't Work

Juliette Kayyem suggested the freshman Texas GOP lawmaker support his argument with facts -- "not with mocking a woman."
Open Image Modal
By 

Senior Reporter, HuffPost

|

A noted border security expert who opposes President Donald Trump’s proposed border wall is hoping to bridge a gap with a Republican congressman who attempted to mansplain the issue to her last week.

Juliette Kayyem, a national security expert and former assistant secretary at the Department of Homeland Security, on Monday tried to rekindle her Twitter dialogue with freshman Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas), who condescendingly offered on Friday to arrange a security explanation for the expert.

Kayyem promised to respond in detail when she was back from vacation.

Kayyem finally responded on Monday, first apologizing to Crenshaw for the delay. 

Then she went into a very lengthy, very thoughtful and very informative series of tweets in which she explained why Trump’s promised wall is neither the most effective nor the most efficient way to protect the border.

Kayyem then got personal with Crenshaw, and addressed what she called the “mansplaining thing.”

Kayyem took a break for about eight hours before taking up the thread again, offering more details on what effective border security would entail.

Crenshaw hadn’t responded to Kayyem’s thread as of Tuesday afternoon. 

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

Why Open Borders Make More Sense Than Militarization
Because our immigration system is universally regarded as "broken."(01 of15)
Open Image Modal
Politicians, journalists and activists of every ideology refer to the U.S. immigration system as "broken." If what we're doing doesn't work, why not try something different? (credit:Demonstrators from opposing sides confront each other, Friday, July 4, 2014. (AP) )
Because rich people already live an open-borders life.(02 of15)
Open Image Modal
Rich individuals park their fortunes in foreign countries to avoid taxes. People from wealthy families cross borders with ease. So why put such harsh restrictions on people who immigrate to work for paychecks? (credit:Michael Grabois via Getty Images)
Because if capital and goods can flow across borders, why not labor? (03 of15)
Open Image Modal
The North American Free Trade Agreement made it easier for business owners to invest in Mexico and for goods to flow freely across the U.S.-Mexico border. But the millions of Mexicans put out of work by these changes weren't permitted to cross the border in search of jobs created here.

"If you think about it, corporations have open borders," Arturo Carmona, executive director of the grassroots organization Presente.org, told HuffPost. "But when you think about workers' rights, family reunification -- you have closed borders." (credit:Fuse via Getty Images)
Because undocumented immigrants are the victims of legislation that is, frankly, dumb.(04 of15)
Open Image Modal
The undocumented population began skyrocketing in the 1960s when the United States started restricting the number of immigrant visas for Mexicans. In 1977, Congress capped the number of such visas for Mexican workers at 20,000, a number wildly out of sync with labor demand. Subsequent revisions to immigration law consistently disregarded demand for Mexican, and to a lesser degree, Central American labor. (credit:A man looks out toward the U.S. from the Mexican side of the border fence. (Getty) )
Because immigration improves the economy.(05 of15)
Open Image Modal
From all the controversy surrounding the issue, you might think that immigration was an economic evil that the U.S. is forced by circumstance to put up with. In fact, the consensus among economists is that immigration -- both legal and illegal -- is good for the overall economy. While competition from undocumented workers and new arrivals pushes wages down in some sectors, the net effect is positive. (credit:Construction worker Sebastian Martinez of Mexico works at a construction site. (AP) )
Because Europe opened many of its borders, and the sky didn't fall.(06 of15)
Open Image Modal
As Bill Hing points out, when the European Union was created, effectively allowing the free movement of EU citizens across the common market's borders, a funny thing happened. Countries once known for their high output of immigrants, like Spain, Portugal and Ireland, became immigrant-receiving countries -- a pattern that held until the worldwide economic crisis in 2007.

"Why?" says Hing. "Because there was huge investment in their economies. If we approach immigration the way they did in the EU [...] you actually will not see a hysterical flood of migrants across the border. But I do think it needs to be coupled with serious investment in poor areas of Mexico." (credit:Robert Churchill via Getty Images)
Because it makes humanitarian sense.(07 of15)
Open Image Modal
Some 60,000 unaccompanied minors have crossed the border illegally in the past year, most of them seeking refuge from poverty and violence in their home countries. That's to say nothing of the thousands of Mexicans applying for asylum to escape the country's drug war or the millions of others simply looking for work.

Americans are proud of their country's history of harboring Irish families fleeing famine in the late 19th century, as well as Jewish refugees from World War II. Why not refugees from Mexico and Central America? (credit: Central American migrants climb on a northbound train in Ixtepec, Mexico. (AP) )
Because the U.S. is responsible for creating the conditions that cause illegal immigration. (08 of15)
Open Image Modal
From overthrowing left-wing governments during the Cold War, to financing military forces that massacred civilians, to pushing economic policies that put Mexican farmers out of work by the millions, the United States has helped create a lot of the conditions that have resulted in mass migration from Latin America. It would logically follow that the U.S., which has reaped economic benefits from this mayhem, should allow immigrants to stay. (credit:Patricia Garcia holds a picture of his brother Juan Carlos Garcia, a victim of El Salvador's civil war. (AP) )
Because it allows people to go back.(09 of15)
Open Image Modal
Most people only think of undocumented immigrants as coming into the United States, but for most of the United States' history, Mexican and Central American workers crossed into the country for seasonal agricultural labor and then returned home. Some people who work in other industries come to the U.S. to raise capital and return home to start a business. With the militarization of the border, returning has become so difficult that most people simply stay. (credit:A migrant farm worker presents his documentation. (AP) )
Because fewer people will die crossing the border.(10 of15)
Open Image Modal
Putting up the border wall in high-traffic areas has simply pushed crossings into the desert, where more people die. (credit: A van of migrants travel past a memorial asking "How many more have to die?" (AP))
Because border spending is out of control.(11 of15)
Open Image Modal
Neither party can boast a record of fiscal responsibility when it comes to the border. The U.S. spends more on border enforcement than on all other federal law enforcement agencies combined. (credit:Texas Parks and Wildlife Wardens patrol the Rio Grand on the U.S.-Mexico border. (AP) )
Because border enforcement punishes the wrong people. (12 of15)
Open Image Modal
Much of the resentment against undocumented immigrants is rooted in the inaccurate belief that they damage the economy, and the semi-accurate belief that they depress wages in some sectors.

But that's unfair. Wages for American workers have been stagnant since the 1970s, well before the latest wave of mass migration. And many economists say the destruction of high-paying jobs in sectors like manufacturing has far more to do with globalization, the lowering of tariffs that protected U.S. industries and companies moving overseas. Low-skilled workers rightly angry about their sagging wages and lack of job opportunities have more of a bone to pick with business leaders and elected officials than they do with their fellow workers. (credit:A guard escorts an immigrant detainee from his 'segregation cell.' (AP) )
Because American employers want the labor.(13 of15)
Open Image Modal
From tech to agriculture, U.S. employers are clamoring for the government to increase the number of immigrant visas to supply their industries with workers. Imagine what our economy would look like if people in Alabama couldn't move to take jobs in New York City, or if people in Louisiana couldn't work for a better future in Texas. That's more or less what our immigration policy currently looks like. (credit:Farmworkers pick beans in a field, Monday, Nov. 18, 2013, in Florida City, Florida. (AP))
Because our immigration system criminalizes people unnecessarily. (14 of15)
Open Image Modal
Illegal entry and illegal re-entry charges now make up the largest category of crimes on the federal docket, outnumbering drug offenses. If our borders were more open, there would be no need to incarcerate these people. (credit:Immigrant inmates line up for breakfast at the Maricopa County Tent City jail. (Getty))
Because our enforcement system is a piggy bank for the private prison industry. (15 of15)
Open Image Modal
Jailing people for migrating isn't just morally questionable, it's expensive. The clearest beneficiary from this system is the private-prison industry, which receives millions of dollars to jail immigrants on behalf of the federal government. (credit:Elena Eliachevitch via Getty Images)
Suggest a correction
|
Submit a tip