Justice Breyer Says Court's Dobbs Decision Leaves ‘Too Many Questions’
“Are they really going to allow women to die on the table because they won’t allow an abortion which would save her life?" the retired Supreme Court justice asked.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn abortion as a constitutional right was naive and leaves “too many questions,” former Justice Stephen Breyer reportedly said in a recent interview that characterized the court as taking a wrong turn but a restorable one.
“Are they really going to allow women to die on the table because they won’t allow an abortion which would save her life? I mean, really, no one would do that. And they wouldn’t do that. And there’ll be dozens of questions like that,” he said while discussing the ruling and the March 26 release of his book, “Reading the Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism.”
“The Dobbs majority’s hope that legislatures and not courts will decide the abortion question will not be realized,” he’s quoted by the Times in an excerpt of his book.
The book, as the title suggests, critiques the current conservative-leaning court as being too focused on determining and enforcing the Constitution’s original meaning, no matter how archaic and contrasting the law, written in 1787, may be to modern society, according to the Times’ review.
Advertisement
Justice Samuel Alito, in writing for the court’s majority in the Dobbs ruling, reasoned that abortion is not “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition,” and, therefore, it is not protected as a right.
Breyer reportedly laid out three large problems with originality in his book, the first being that judges are not necessarily historians and able to adequately interpret the Constitution as it was understood at the time it was adopted.
By focusing on originality, they’re also not considering “the practical consequences of the constitutional rules they propound” or “the ways in which our values as a society evolve over time as we learn from the mistakes of our past,” he wrote.
Breyer reportedly did not accuse any of the justices of being partisan or acting in bad faith. Without stating names, he did appear to caution three Supreme Court justices appointed by then-President Donald J. Trump — Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — against rushing any ruling in any major court case.
Advertisement
“Major changes take time, and there are many years left for the newly appointed justices to decide whether they want to build the law using only textualism and originalism,” he wrote.
The Supreme Court’s next major abortion case is scheduled for March 26, the same day as Breyer’s book is to be released. The court will decide on access to a commonly used abortion pill, mifepristone.
Support HuffPost
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you’ll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.