Cancer Patients Can Preserve Their Fertility, But Doctors Aren't Telling Them How

For some survivors, this is the only way they can become biological parents.
Open Image Modal
Rachell Moodie was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2009 and underwent a round of IVF to freeze embryos before undergoing cancer treatment. She now has two daughters with her husband.
Courtesy of Rachell Moodie

Rachell Moodie had been married for just nine months when she got the diagnosis: stage 2 invasive ductal carcinoma, the most common kind of breast cancer.

“We got married early,” said Moodie, who was 24 at the time. “Everyone gave us a hard time about it, but thank goodness that we did.”

Because Moodie’s uncle had died from leukemia when he was just 13 years old, her family had experience with this kind of news. And her grandmother, recalling warnings from her son’s cancer treatment, told Moodie that it could make her infertile.

Armed with the information, she went to her cancer doctor and asked what she could do to make sure she got the chance to have children with her husband. He immediately referred her to a fertility clinic in Tampa, Florida, where she saw an infertility specialist within days of her cancer diagnosis.

Moodie and her husband went through the IVF process and doctors extracted 10 eggs from her. They ended up freezing five embryos in 2009 before Moodie began treatment for her breast cancer.

Not all the patients Moodie’s cancer doctor treated were as lucky as her. Over the course of her treatment, Moodie befriended a young woman who was the same age, with the same exact cancer she had, who had been diagnosed by the same doctor. This friend, however, didn’t know to bring up fertility preservation, and the doctor didn’t suggest it ― even though he had just counseled Moodie about her options two weeks earlier.

“Because she’s shy and she’s not as educated as I am, she didn’t get the same treatment I did,” Moodie said. “Which I don’t think is fair.”

“Because she’s shy and she’s not as educated as I am, she didn’t get the same treatment I did. Which I don’t think is fair.”

- Rachell Moodie

Since 2006, the American Society of Clinical Oncology has issued recommendations about how doctors should approach the issue of infertility and fertility preservation with newly diagnosed cancer patients. Chemotherapy, radiation or surgery could render them infertile or even sterile in the future, which is why doctors recommend that people who are interested in genetic parenthood in the future freeze sperm, eggs, embryos or reproductive tissue before beginning cancer treatment.

But often, a patient has to rely on a doctor to initiate this conversation ― and many doctors don’t. A survey of 259 young female cancer patients from 2009 to 2013 found that only 62 percent had been counseled about fertility preservation, despite ASCO’s recommendations.

Five years after Moodie’s cancer diagnosis, those embryos resulted in the birth of her first daughter. Moodie knows “for sure” that she wouldn’t have been able to have her first child if her grandmother hadn’t advised her to approach the doctor about fertility preservation.

Moodie is one of 70,000 people of childbearing age (ages 15 to 39) in the U.S. who are diagnosed with cancer every year.

Like Moodie and her friend, many of these younger patients ― approximately 5 percent of everyone diagnosed with cancer ― have not yet had the chance to have children.

And because the age of first-time parents continues to rise in the U.S. ― currently at 26 for women and 31 for men ― this population of cancer patients who may need fertility preservation treatment is growing.

Listen to Episode 2 of IVFML Becoming Family below.

One reason for the inconsistency in doctor advice to patients could be the fact that fertility preservation is rarely covered by insurance plans. Only five states in the U.S. have laws that force private insurers to cover fertility preservation for medical reasons like cancer, so most patients need to pay out of pocket on an extremely tight deadline.

For example, Moodie was diagnosed with cancer on a Monday and was at a fertility clinic by Thursday. That’s not very much time to come up with $24,000 ― the average amount of money it takes to do one cycle of IVF. Sperm-banking is also expensive, but total costs generally come in under $1,000, not counting the yearly storage fee.

Doctors may be holding back because they judge that the patient might not be able to afford the costly egg- or sperm-freezing procedure.

Indeed, a 2015 analysis found that those without insurance were more likely to report that doctors hadn’t told them about how cancer treatment could affect their future fertility.

Medical professionals need to learn how to counsel cancer patients about their fertility. Cathy Elstner, the head nurse overseeing the adolescent and young adult program at Tampa’s Moffitt Cancer Center, said that health providers can’t let their own judgments about the patient get in the way of giving them all the information they need to make the best decision for them.

“You [may] have a patient sitting in front of you that you know is homeless and very poor,” Elstner explained. “Or a patient that has stage 4 cancer, [and] you know they’re not going to make it.”  

Each patient in these two scenarios deserves complete information about what cancer treatments could do to their fertility, she said.

“Not telling them is the worst thing.”

There are organizations like the Livestrong Foundation that help cancer patients afford the fees. Livestrong helped Moodie pay for the medications for her IVF cycle, while her family pooled money to help cover the procedure.

After her diagnosis and fertility preservation procedure, Moodie transferred to Moffitt Cancer Center, where she was treated for her breast cancer. Following the advice of her doctors at MCC, Moodie waited five years from her initial cancer diagnosis to see if she was in complete remission before attempting to get pregnant with her frozen embryos.

Moodie has gone in yearly to check on her remission, and doctors have confirmed every time that the cancer has not returned.

And a year after her first daughter’s birth, Moodie and her husband spontaneously became pregnant with their second daughter ― a complete shock to them, considering that they had never used protection in the five years leading up to their first frozen embryo transfer.

As more doctors and cancer care centers focus on quality-of-life issues after treatment, knowledge about fertility preservation has begun to spread. But awareness is just half of the battle.

After being informed about the possibility of banking eggs or sperm, patients still have to face one difficult dilemma: namely, how they’re going to be able to afford it all. Until fertility preservation becomes a standard part of cancer care that is covered by insurance, it will be out of reach for many, if not most, patients who want it.

IVFML Becoming Family is produced and edited by Anna Almendrala, Simon Ganz, Nick Offenberg, and Sara Patterson. Send us an email at IVFML@huffpost.com.

Our 2024 Coverage Needs You

As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.

Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.

to keep our news free for all.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

11 Little Known Breast Cancer Facts
Breast cancer is actually many different types of cancer(01 of10)
Open Image Modal
Breast cancer, in its simplest definition, is cancer that starts in the cells of the breast. But what we call "breast cancer" actually includes several different types of cancer, all of which require different treatments and have different prognoses. (credit:Shutterstock)
A lump doesn't always (or even usually) mean cancer(02 of10)
Open Image Modal
Most breast lumps indicate something other than breast cancer—some possible causes for breast lumps include cysts, fibrosis, or benign tumours. And some women are just prone to lumpy breasts, which is stressful but harmless. That said, if you find a lump, get it checked out — know that the odds are good that it's nothing serious, but see your doctor about it for your own peace of mind. (credit:Susan G. Komen)
Breast cancer isn't always a lump(03 of10)
Open Image Modal
It's helpful to know that breast cancer can appear in forms other than a lump, which means there are other physical signs you should watch for. Other symptoms that you should get checked out include thickening of the skin in the breast or underarm area; swelling, warmth, redness, or darkening of the breasts; a change in your breast size or shape; dimpling or puckering of the breast skin; an itchy, scaly sore or rash on the nipple; a pulling in of your nipple or another part of your breast; sudden nipple discharge; or pain in one spot of the breast that doesn't go away. (credit:Shutterstock)
Breast cancer risk isn't always determined by family history(04 of10)
Open Image Modal
A family history of breast cancer (on either your mother or father's side) can be an indication that your personal odds of developing it are higher than average, but they don't guarantee that you will. As well, the majority of women who develop breast cancer have no identifiable risk factors, including family history. And the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations are hereditary, but only account for five to 10 per cent of all breast cancers. (credit:Shutterstock)
BRCA1 or BRCA2 don't always mean cancer is in your future(05 of10)
Open Image Modal
The news that Angelina Jolie had had a preventative double mastectomy after testing positive for the BRCA1 gene mutation made many women wonder if they had the same mutation--and what it would mean for them if they did. If you do have the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation, your lifetime risk of developing breast cancer or ovarian cancer is significantly elevated, and women with the mutations who do get cancer tend to develop it at younger ages; one estimate states that 55 to 65 per cent of the women with the BRCA1 mutation and 45 per cent of those with the BRCA2 mutation will develop breast cancer by age 70, versus 12 per cent in the general population. But it does not mean that cancer is definitely in your future, and every person has to make her own individual decision, based on a variety of factors, about how to best mitigate her risk of disease. (credit:Shutterstock)
Not all women have a one-in-eight risk for breast cancer(06 of10)
Open Image Modal
This often-cited statistic is somewhat misleading. Breast cancer risk varies based on a variety of factors, including age, weight, and ethnic background. Risk increases as you get older (http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/breast/statistics/age.htm): most breast-cancer cases are in women in their 50s and 60s. Also, some ethnic groups appear to be more susceptible to breast cancer; the National Cancer Institute in the U.S. says that white, non-Hispanic women have the highest overall risk of developing breast cancer, while women of Korean descent have the lowest risk, but African-American women have a higher death rate. Finally, being overweight or obese may also up your risk; there is evidence that being obese or overweight after menopause can up your breast-cancer risk, possibly because fat tissue is a source of estrogen. (credit:Shutterstock)
There are ways to lower your risk(07 of10)
Open Image Modal
You can't prevent breast cancer, per se, but there are ways to lower your personal risk. If you are overweight or obese, you could try to lose weight in a healthful way; if you are already in a healthy weight range, try to stay there. Exercise regularly, as as little as 75 to 150 minutes of walking a week has been shown to have a lowering effect on risk. Limit your alcohol consumption — research found that women who have two or more alcoholic drinks each day have an elevated risk of breast cancer. And avoid hormone therapy during menopause, as a combo of estrogen and progestin has been shown to raise breast-cancer risk. (credit:Shutterstock)
Mammograms aren't foolproof(08 of10)
Open Image Modal
Mammograms are a powerful way to detect breast cancer early on, but they aren't 100 per cent. Mammograms are most effective in women aged 50 and over; they detect about 83 per cent of women who have breast cancer in that age group. For younger women, the sensitivity is 78 per cent. However, that does mean some cancers are missed and that there are false-positive results as well, which could require a biopsy to confirm. Talk to your doctor about when you should start getting mammograms regularly, or if you have symptoms that suggest that you should get one. (credit:Shutterstock)
Fertility treatments don't raise your breast-cancer risk(09 of10)
Open Image Modal
Some wondered if Giuliana Rancic's fertility treatments were behind her diagnosis of breast cancer in her late 30s, but experts interviewed by WebMD said that there is no strong evidence connecting the disease with the use of fertility drugs. It's true that hormonal treatments can raise the risk for post-menopausal women, but women undergoing fertility treatments are almost never in that age range, and also take the medications for a much shorter period of time. (credit:Getty Images)
Most women survive breast cancer(10 of10)
Open Image Modal
Cancer is scary, but in most cases, women who are diagnosed with breast cancer survive and lead healthy lives. According to the Breast Cancer Society of Canada, the five-year survival rate is 80 per cent for men and 88 per cent for women. That's up from 79 per cent for women in 1986. (credit:Shutterstock)